Plugged In

Critics: ‘Final Fantasy XIII-2′ fixes problems, creates new ones

Final Fantasy XIII-2 (Square-Enix)The most misleading name in role-playing game history is back for seconds.

Releasing Tuesday, Final Fantasy XIII-2 is a direct sequel to Final Fantasy XIII, one of the most controversial games in the long-running franchise. It's a rare move by game makers Square-Enix; aside from a few spinoffs, they've traditionally introduced brand new worlds and characters in each new Final Fantasy release rather than pump out sequels.

So why now? Because while the last game was a sales monster, it was a polarizing experience for gamers. Many decried it as being too linear, featuring what amounted to a 25-hour tutorial before finally blossoming. And while it scored decently overall, Square-Enix couldn't shake the criticism.

Instead, they decided to face it head on -- and according to critics, they've mostly succeeded in fixing what was wrong with the original, though with a current Metacritic rating of a solid but unspectacular 81, it's not exactly the must-have fantasy disgruntled fans had hoped for.

But at least it isn't linear.

"Final Fantasy XIII-2 showers you with choice and branching paths," says IGN's Ryan Clements in an 8/10 review, adding that "the battle system functions faster and includes several new features like tameable monster allies." The trouble? All those tweaks come at the cost of the unfocused storytelling.

"Final Fantasy XIII-2 makes costly sacrifices to its narrative in order to achieve mechanical advancements," he notes, though he also calls it a "better game."

-- Check out The History of Final Fantasy

Game Informer largely agrees, with writer Joe Juba calling it a "highly polished and more streamlined gameplay experience" while wishing it was "integrated with a story that isn't laughable and borderline insulting." They reward it an 8/10 as well.

To Joystiq, however, just fixing stuff doesn't necessarily make for a good game.

"At times, it feels like the development team just went down a laundry list and added everything that fans believed Final Fantasy XIII lacked," writes reviewer Jason Schreier. "Non-linear dungeons? Check. Sidequests? Check. NPCs and towns? Check, check. In other words, the whole game seems like one big apology." The result? An unapologetic 3/5, though he adds that it at least "takes one hesitant step forward" from Final Fantasy XIII.

So should you walk alongside it? That seems to depend on how much you loved/loathed the first game, as the sequel is clearly a different beast. Maybe an over-the-top trailer will sway you one way or the other:

Like us on Facebook and follow @yahoogames on Twitter for the latest stories and chances to win free stuff!

 

49 comments

  • txarches74  •  Odessa, Texas  •  1 month 21 days ago
    Please I need help. The game and the strategy guide do not seem to match. What is wrong???
  • Bowoneshi  •  Athens, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    Sqaure Enix is damned if they do damned if they don't. They release a story driven game and everyone #$%$ about gameplay. So they make a sequel focused on gameplay and now everyone is #$%$ because it isn't story-driven. Make up your mind people!
    • landon 3 months ago
      not about the lack of story, it is just that the story sucks. Not that I dislike the game.
    • Crohn 3 months ago
      I kind of agree, thumbs up to you.

      The thing is, I'm one of those who wants a good balance. Too much of one thing will turn out bad. How about a FF game with a good story AND a good gameplay? Not AMAZING gameplay but trashy story... or vice versa.
    • Chase Rohrbaugh 3 months ago
      The problem is that no matter what you do, you can't please everyone, especially the FF fanbase. I liked XIII, although i will admit the first few CH were tedious. Hope this one will be better. Personally, i believe game play is more important.
  • Erin  •  3 months ago
    Final Fantasy for me is all about the story line. I loved Final Fantasy VII, VIII, IX, X and X-2. VII has to be the best, hands down, and I wish they would remake VII for the PS3, with better graphics. It also would be pretty cool if they did a sequel (not a “branch off” like the Dirge of Cerberus). I also miss the ORIGINAL summon monsters and how they were used.

    The problems with the new Final Fantasy games are that they focus on all the wrong things. They have lost sight of what truly made a great Final Fantasy game. They neglect the story line and opt for complex battle systems. They strayed so far from what made them enjoyable in the first place. Why ruin a good thing? Hopefully they get the next one right!!!
    • andy 3 months ago
      might i make a retro suggestion at least iv
    • bennek 3 months ago
      A straight-up VII remake would be cool; I would love it if they ONLY changed the graphics. Keep the materia system, play mechanics, NO VOICE ACTING. They always tend to be over-dramatic and sappy. I agree with you on the crappy story and complex battle system bit. I never played the branch off games; they're just lies. I did watch the Advent Children movie- liked the graphics but the story...not so much.
      A Vagrant Story remake would be awesome too...or a sequel.
    • Aita 2 months ago
      Yeah, if you want a movie, go watch a movie... they actually have a Final Fantasy anime (Final Fantasy Unlimited), you should check that out instead.

      In the meantime, all of us who prefer to have our storytelling with dice and a table and enjoy video games for the challenge they give would prefer for you to please not step on our toes.

      Also, if by "original" summon monsters you mean monsters who replaced party members in combat, I agree... oh, you didn't play games that old? good to know
  • Damery  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
    IGN, GameInformer etc... All paid off reviewers. Their reviews have no credibility. They should start leaving the criticism to actual gamers. I sat and watched an stream of IGN reviewing FFXIII-2 and they were showering it with praises about how its so much better than the first. The first mind you, they gave a review of 8.9..So if the sequel is so much better how does it get a significantly lower score(8.0) than the original? I also noticed annual games like COD manage to all but re-paste the same game year after year and still eek out 9.0+ scores.
    • Chase Rohrbaugh 3 months ago
      That's the problem. Games like COD can get away with re-pasting, but FF got stuck in a "always something new" idea. If it's not new, there not trying, or ripping us off, etc. If it is new, it either sucks or is ripped off something else. There several good stuff in every FF, but it surrounded by whats "rated" as bad. It's impossible to please Veteran players and newcomers, and there trying to mix it into something that turns both of them off.
    • Klaus 3 months ago
      So who exactly do you think would have the money and nessecity to pay off these guys more than Square/Enix? There's no other RPG's coming out now so what's the point? Seems like other companies should just spend that money on making better games eh? I've been pretty pleased with IGN's and GameInformer reviews so if you're not than either play it yourself or..i don't know, that's about it really.
  • Allen  •  Dover, Delaware  •  3 months ago
    Just once Square Enix, would you go back to free roam world maps, old school battle systems like in FFVII, and cant you PLEASE, find a way to bring back a materia style magic system? Do you want to know why FFVII is still most peoples favorite FF? BECAUSE IT DID EVERYTHING RIGHT! Think about it...you had a freaking storyline where you had to cross dress for crying out loud! lol....that, the gold saucer, roaming out to Yuffie's territory, breaking free of Midgar...these things are CLASSIC. I could remember finally being able to roam the world, and thinking wow...the game hasnt even started yet and we've done so much!
  • at  •  Prince Frederick, Maryland  •  3 months ago
    In my opinion FF should be circled around the story line! I mean customization and gameplay is key too ( I love how it changes from Materia to Junction, etc.. ) but it is FF we're talking about, it has to have a good story (not to mention secrets like FF7's Knights of the Round and the Golden Chocobo :)! sorry, I guess i'm sounding like a fangirl). FF1, 7, 8, and 10 all the way!!! Also I kinda want them to make FF7 for PS3 but I'd rather not have them mess with a classic.
  • chip  •  3 months ago
    omg il say it again, i miss the free run/fly world map instead of a "map" with menu options.
    • Klaus 3 months ago
      definitely, airships rule!
  • Guam  •  Muskegon, Michigan  •  3 months ago
    The FF series has always been about epic storytelling, music and beautiful cut-scenes; customization was just a bonus for the players and was often pumping out unique battle systems not seen in the same genre. These "critics" that are crying out how square has lost their path from their previous games are bashing the same point of what made those previous games epic.

    If the trolls are crying about how the game is too much story, then they bought the wrong game and should just go back to the type of games they've always played, which they're trolling about how there is no story in it.

    I have played many types of RPG games and each type tailored to what I wanted in a RPG. Final Fantasy has always been a game that I bought knowing that I was going to experience an amazing storyline and dramatic cut-scenes with characters that I will remember for years to come. They shouldn't fix what isn't broken, they should just keep doing what they've always done, and that's to give the gamers an epic story they will never forget.
    • John 3 months ago
      That, my allegedly Polynesian friend, is a straw man argument. No one 'hates' a good story. Unless you are talking about the NES days, Final Fantasy (and other Square stuff like Chrono Trigger) games have had a lot of ways to change the overall story. Hidden bonus characters, non-linear dungeons, dialogue options, non-plot essential story lines, all of this equates to 'more stuff to do other than the main quest'.

      I think our expectations about price, release time, and all the intangible game mechanics are a lot higher than they were back then, and if a developer can't quantify certain aspects of a game, it is probably hard to justify the time and money spent on it. Thus, the game suffers.

      Instead of arguing about which crap is more important to a good game, why don't we try to encourage the game companies to invest in better and faster ways of designing games. Maybe publishers should share profits with developers. Maybe we, as customers, should be willing to consider the amount of content in a game, and the hours spent playing it, when we think about the price.
  • chip  •  3 months ago
    all i ask is go back to the FF-FF9 style, giant free roaming world map, awesome story and gameplay.
  • Danielle Franklin  •  Memphis, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
    Oh come on... I may don't have a PS3 nor the FFXIII and FFXIII-2 game, but that FFXIII-2 game isn't all that bad. They made filler games for FFVII (and that Advent Children movie along with Advent Children Complete.) It looks like to me that there is more in the FFXIII storyline just like Kingdom Hearts. So I'm not hatting on FFXIII-2 despite I don't have the game and a PS3.
  • Sammichfoall  •  Flagstaff, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Final Fantasy 13 wasn't so good. I got maybe 3/4 of the game done. But it got so boring, no more suspense, or a good story telling. I got tired of grinding exp for those #$%$ crystals. I'm not going to buy Final Fantasy 13-2. Because I didn't like the first one. But I wish they would release Final Fantasy versus 13. Been waiting 3 years?
  • John  •  Killeen, Texas  •  3 months ago
    I feel they (SE) overreacted in the worst kind of way. A more middling approach (or a legit Final Fantasy VII remake/sequel/reboot/whatever) wouldn't please everybody, but would probably have made for a very good game. Still, as making games shinier and prettier consumes more and more resources from programmers and computers, true masterpieces will be fewer and farther between.
  • Mage  •  Des Moines, Iowa  •  3 months ago
    Eh, the gameing crowd is more ravinous than ever. Thing is, us RPG fans got a little spoiled due to RPGs being the big genre for awhile. Now its all FPS with short stories, focused all on multiplayer. So, with the market no longer saturated, it seems like a longer gap between RPG titles to tide us over, which likely is why we havent had a really good one in awhile. And to be fair, its not just Final Fantasy. Dragon Warrior (Quest) has gotten sub-par DS offerings (none of which stand up to DQ8, let alone its predessors). The last Star Ocean was iffy. About the only strong running RPG left is Pokemon... and when you think about it, thats sad, since its the same game, everytime.
  • CARL-ROSA  •  Memphis, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
    I'll stick with FFXI with all the updates, new areas equipment and lvl99. Use to be lvl75 and took months to a year to get there now alot easier and alot more to do in game besides just killing things like WOW!
  • Don Squeek  •  3 months ago
    It is not impossible to have a story driven game that has great gameplay that is not linear to the point where you feel like you are watching an interactive movie. Bioware does it all the time, Square Enix just can't seem to get the best of both worlds going.
  • Empress  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
    The problem with new FF games is Square keeps listening to people that can't seem to leave VII behind. Move on people, Cloud was NOT the best char ever, nor was VII even the best game. As my husband said, even a meh game by Square, is still a hell of a lot better than almost all other games out there. I will play any FF ever made.
  • Christopher  •  3 months ago
    Final Fantasy 13 sucked plain and simple why would you make a sequel that sucks to.
  • Grand Masta B  •  3 months ago
    I got to a huge plane in FFXIII and had to go around killing like 500 monster, yeah over that #$%$ worst stoy of all time...
  • jasp  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
    Oh Come on people, Its not that bad.. at least SE tried there best make the best of it.. After all they promised 500 years of Final Fantasy production :))
  • M  •  3 months ago
    I NEVER played a FF game before I don't like trun based, I won't lie gameplay of FF has ALWAYS been a trun off for me, but when it comes to cutsenes squre nails it. I would play FF over cod ANYTIME, I bro got a ps3 and his first game was FF-13 we have it but I dont play it the case has dust on it along with the ps3 but they still work!
POLL

What is the Greatest Music Game of all time?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options