You have not played any game recently!

Remove ?

You are removing the game from your account and My Games . Depending on the developer, your game progress may be permanently deleted.

Note: may still retain some data you shared with them directly or during game play. Please visit () privacy policy for details about having your data deleted.

Plugged In

EA sued for helicopter imagery in ‘Battlefield 3′

Plugged In

Hit military shooter Battlefield 3 is a very realistic game. Maybe too realistic.

View photo

.

Battlefield 3 (EA)

Electronic Arts has found itself in the midst of a legal battle with Bell Helicopter parent Textron over the game maker's use of images of real world helicopters in the game

EA says its use of the choppers — specifically the AH-1Z Viper, the UH-1Y, and the V-22 Osprey — are protected under the First Amendment and constitute fair use. Textron argues they were used without permission and EA failed to pay licensing fees.

The suit, which EA filed pre-emptively before Textron had a chance, came after negotiations between the two companies broke down last month. Textron had sent a cease and desist order to the company, demanding that the models be removed from the game.

"The parties have been unable to resolve their dispute," EA's complaint says. "EA therefore has a reasonable and strong apprehension that it will soon face a trademark and/or trade dress action from Textron. … The Bell-manufactured helicopters depicted in Battlefield 3 are just a few of countless creative visual, audio, plot and programming elements that make up EA's expressive work, a first-person military combat simulation."

It's an argument that served the company well in the recent suit filed by NCAA players who felt they should be compensated for their image being used in that franchise. The judge in that case agreed that because the company, as all video game publishers do now, enjoyed clear First Amendment protections, it was within its rights to use the images.

A big question looms, however: if EA receives a favorable ruling in this sort of case, what sort of impact could that have on other titles that feature licensed products? The company currently negotiates with sports leagues and car companies featured in other franchises, but if the courts continue to rule that publishers can use branded items under fair use, it could have an impact on licensing deals moving forward — especially if the company puts a disclaimer on the game saying it's not endorsing any brands.

Like us on Facebook and follow @yahoogames on Twitter for the latest stories and chances to win free stuff!

View Comments